Skip to main content
Home WILDLEX

Main navigation

  • About
  • User Agreement
  • Acknowledgements
  • Other tools
    • ELC Learning Platform
    • Protected Areas Law
    • Law for Sustainability
    • Water Law and Governance Support Platform
    • ECOLEX
  • Contribute resources

User account menu

  • Log in

WILDLEX

Database of Wildlife Related Law

  • Court Decisions
  • Legislation
  • Literature
  • Resources
Found 6 search results
Show on map

Showing 6 court decisions filtered by Country (United States of America), Species (Fish)

Zoom in Zoom out Reset zoom Close
  • Sort by most recent
  • Sort by least recent
  • Sort by relevance

Defenders of Wildlife v. Hogarth

United States of America
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
National - higher court
General
2003

Fishermen in the Eastern Tropical Pacific Ocean sought to exploit the synergy between dolphins and yellowfin tuna and began adopting a fishing method called purse seine fishing. Fishermen using this method inevitably set their nets around dolphins and tuna alike.

Humane Society of the United States v. Clinton

United States of America
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
National - higher court
General
2001

The Driftnet Act establishes a process under which the United States may take various actions against a foreign nation whose fishing vessels on the high seas engage in large-scale driftnet fishing. Italian fishing vessels were using these nets. Subsequent negotiations between Italy and the President of the U.S.

Humane Society of the United States v. Brown

United States of America
United States Court of International Trade
Others
Other or unknown
1996

In addition to banning large-scale pelagic driftnets by U.S. vessels and nationals, the Driftnet Act established a mechanism to deter the use of driftnets by foreign vessels in international waters. Under this mechanism, the U.S.

Yates v. United States

United States of America
Supreme Court of the United States
National - higher court
General
2015

A fisheries officer noticed that the defendant (Yates) had scores of undersized red grouper on board. This was a violation of federal conservation regulations, which prohibited fishermen from retaining grouper under a certain length.

United States of America v. Marshalls 201

United States of America
U.S. District Court of Guam
National - lower court
General
2008

The defendant is the owner of the Marshall 201, a vessel spotted by a U.S. Coast Guard within the U.S. EEZ surrounding Baker and Howland Islands. The vessel had no permission to fish in the zone. Nevertheless, the vessel carried 130 tons of tuna presumably harvested from U.S. waters.

American Pelagic Fishing Company, L.P. v. United States

United States of America
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
National - higher court
General
2004

The plaintiff is American Pelagic, a company whose President and sole shareholder, purchased a large boat, the Atlantic Star, in 1996 to transform it into a massive fishing vessel. In 1997, NMFS issued both a valid Atlantic mackerel permit and a Northeast Multispecies fish permit to the vessel.

Search filters

Country

  • Canada (1)
  • Tanzania, Un. Rep. of (1)
  • (-) United States of America (6)

Territorial subdivision

  • (1)

Type of court

  • National - higher court (4)
  • National - lower court (1)
  • Others (1)

Species

  • African elephant (6)
  • Blue King Crab (1)
  • Chinkara (Indian gazelle) (1)
  • Elephant (1)
  • (-) Fish (6)
  • Gorilla (1)
  • Narwhale (1)
  • Orangutan (1)
  • Paddlefish (roe of) (1)
  • Pancake Tortoise (1)
  • Parrot (1)
  • Rhinoceros (1)
  • Sperm Whale (1)
  • Turtle (2)
  • Urial (Punjab) (1)
  • Walrus (1)

Language

  • English (6)

Year/Period

from to
Reset all filters
  • IUCN
  • GIZ

Footer menu

  • Contact