Skip to main content
Home WILDLEX

Main navigation

  • About
  • User Agreement
  • Acknowledgements
  • Other tools
    • ELC Learning Platform
    • Protected Areas Law
    • Law for Sustainability
    • Water Law and Governance Support Platform
    • ECOLEX
  • Contribute resources

User account menu

  • Log in

WILDLEX

Database of Wildlife Related Law

  • Court Decisions
  • Legislation
  • Literature
  • Resources
Found 32 search results
Show on map

Showing 32 court decisions filtered by Country (India, United States of America)

Zoom in Zoom out Reset zoom Close
  • Sort by most recent
  • Sort by least recent
  • Sort by relevance

United states v hale

United States of America
United states Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Criminal
2004

The Hales, a married couple, owned and operated a wholesale caviar business, Royaloff Caviar, in Tennessee and Kentucky. They utilized the roe of paddlefish (Polyodon spathula), which are large, shark-like river fish with long, flat blade-like snouts.

Defenders of Wildlife v. Hogarth

United States of America
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
National - higher court
General
2003

Fishermen in the Eastern Tropical Pacific Ocean sought to exploit the synergy between dolphins and yellowfin tuna and began adopting a fishing method called purse seine fishing. Fishermen using this method inevitably set their nets around dolphins and tuna alike.

Loggerhead Turtle v. Volusia County

United States of America
United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
National - higher court
General
1998

A citizen filled a suit seeking declaratory and injunctive relief against a county in the state of Florida. Invoking a vicarious-liability theory, the plaintiffs alleged that the county’s “refusal ... to ban beachfront artificial light sources that adversely impact sea turtles” violated the ESA’s “take” prohibition.

United States of America v Bernal

United States of America
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
National - higher court
Civil
1996

Victor Bernal and Eduardo Berges were convicted of various crimes in connection with an attempt to export two endangered primates--an orangutan and a gorilla--from the United States to Mexico in violation of the Lacey Act Amendments of 1981 and the Endangered Species Act of 1973.

Humane Society of the United States v. Clinton

United States of America
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
National - higher court
General
2001

The Driftnet Act establishes a process under which the United States may take various actions against a foreign nation whose fishing vessels on the high seas engage in large-scale driftnet fishing. Italian fishing vessels were using these nets. Subsequent negotiations between Italy and the President of the U.S.

Humane Society of the United States v. Brown

United States of America
United States Court of International Trade
Others
Other or unknown
1996

In addition to banning large-scale pelagic driftnets by U.S. vessels and nationals, the Driftnet Act established a mechanism to deter the use of driftnets by foreign vessels in international waters. Under this mechanism, the U.S.

Defenders of Wildlife v. Gutierrez

United States of America
District of Columbia
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
National - higher court
General
2008

On May 19, 2005, a group of environmental organizations (appellants in this case) submitted a petition for emergency rulemaking to NMFS, which requested immediate regulations to require all ships entering and leaving all major East Coast ports to travel at speeds of 12 knots or less within 25 nautical miles of port entrances during expected righ

Yates v. United States

United States of America
Supreme Court of the United States
National - higher court
General
2015

A fisheries officer noticed that the defendant (Yates) had scores of undersized red grouper on board. This was a violation of federal conservation regulations, which prohibited fishermen from retaining grouper under a certain length.

Winter, Secretary of the NAVY v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.

United States of America
Supreme Court of the United States
National - higher court
2008

The US Navy was using mid-frequency active (MFA) sonar during its training exercises off the coast of southern California.

Turtle Island Restoration Network v. Evans

United States of America
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
National - higher court
General
2002

Since 1987, United States regulations have required that shrimp trawlers generally install turtle excluder devices (TEDs) when operating in U.S. waters where sea turtles are located (Section 609 of Public Law 101-162). A group of countries brought a complaint to the Dispute Settle Mechanism of the WTO.

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Current page 3
  • Page 4
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »
Search filters

Country

  • Andorra (1)
  • Australia (2)
  • Botswana (36)
  • Cameroon (360)
  • Canada (10)
  • China (303)
  • Congo (385)
  • Eswatini, Kingdom of (2)
  • Gabon (72)
  • (-) India (7)
  • International (4)
  • Kenya (3)
  • Malawi (5)
  • Namibia (30)
  • South Africa (31)
  • Tanzania, Un. Rep. of (205)
  • Uganda (224)
  • United Kingdom (11)
  • (-) United States of America (25)
  • Zambia (12)
  • Zimbabwe (1)

Territorial subdivision

  • District of Columbia (1)
  • Ohio (1)

Type of court

  • National - higher court (22)
  • National - lower court (7)
  • Others (1)

Species

  • African elephant (6)
  • Blue King Crab (1)
  • Chinkara (Indian gazelle) (1)
  • Elephant (2)
  • Fish (6)
  • Gorilla (1)
  • Mammoth (2)
  • Narwhale (1)
  • Orangutan (1)
  • Paddlefish (roe of) (1)
  • Pancake Tortoise (1)
  • Parrot (1)
  • Rabbit (1)
  • Rhinoceros (1)
  • Sperm Whale (1)
  • Tibetan antelope (1)
  • Turtle (2)
  • Urial (Punjab) (1)
  • Walrus (1)
  • Wild boar (1)

Language

  • English (32)

Year/Period

from to
Reset all filters
  • IUCN
  • GIZ

Footer menu

  • Contact