Wenwu X. was sentenced to 12 years in prison and a fine of RMB 20,000 for illegally transporting and selling rare and endangered wild animals. Congyun L. was sentenced to 3 years in prison and a fine of RMB 1,000 for illegally transporting and selling rare and endangered wild animals. The appellate court upheld this decision. Crime involved items confiscated. Appellants Xiao Wenwu and Liao Congyun illegally acquired and sold precious and endangered wildlife under state protection. The circumstances were particularly serious. Their actions have constituted the crime of illegally acquiring and selling precious and endangered wildlife and should be punished according to law. Appellant Liao Congyun played an auxiliary role in the joint crime and was an accessory. The punishment should be reduced according to law. The defendant, Liao Congyun, who can truthfully confess his crimes after the case, can be given a lighter punishment according to law. Regarding the appellant Xiao Wenwu that he did not acquire and sell owls, the owl seized was not related to it, and his defender submitted that the original verdict found that Xiao Wenwu constituted a crime with insufficient evidence, and his appeal and defense opinions should be found guilty. One confirmed that Xiao Wenwu rented a bungalow from him in the name of storing mountain goods and hired Liao Congyun to feed and clean it. He later discovered that Xiao Wenwu stored an owl. Witness Liao confirmed that Xiao Wenwu repeatedly transported owls from outside to the farm for storage, and then was fed by Liao Congyun. Co-author Huang Jie and appellant Liao Congyun confirmed that the owl seized was acquired by Xiao Wenwu and stored in the farm. Liao Congyun was responsible for the care and feeding of the owl, and Huang Jie was responsible for delivery and sale. The above witness testimony and the same person's confession mutually confirm each other, and can form a complete evidence chain with other evidence in this case, which is sufficient to confirm the criminal fact that the appellant Xiao Wenwu illegally acquired and sold precious and endangered wildlife under state protection, so the above opinions This court does not agree with the facts and evidences found. Regarding the appellant Liao Congyun and his defenders who proposed that their subjective malignancy was small and the original sentence was severe, the appeal and defense opinions of probation should be applied. After investigation, the appellant Liao Congyun ’s criminal circumstances were particularly serious and did not meet the legal conditions for the application of probation. Reasons are insufficient, this court will not accept.