Van Niekerk And Another v The State
1968
The appellants were represented in the Subordinate Court by an attorney, and according to the record, upon the charge being put to them they and their co-accused all pleaded guilty.
Found 24 search results
Martin v. The State
1987
The court held that if it is established that the appellant hunted and killed the animals in the game reserve, the burden shifts to the appellant to establish that he did not know that he was in the game reserve. The appellant thus has to establish on a balance of probabilities that he killed the animals on another piece of land.
The defendant Голиков Антон Вадимович charged felony counts of smuggling threatened and endangered wildlife products (appellate case)
2017
From the beginning of December to December 31, 2010, Hejun M. (sentenced), a resident of Heihe City, purchased bear paws in a Russian city, and thanks to Голиков Антон Вадимович he used the ship Snow Leopard to enter and exit the Sino-Russian border port to transport bear paws to Heihe port. Hongjie G.
The defendants Zuoyue Y., Xianghai Y., etc. charged felony counts of illegally hunting and killing threatened and endangered wildlife (appellate case)
2018
In October 2016, the defendants Zuofeng Y., Zuoyue Y., Xianghai Y. drove to a place named “Shenxian River” at the boundary beam forest farm in Langao County, Shaanxi Province to lay a wire harness to hunt wildlife. Later, the three defendants went up the mountain and found that a black bear had been caught by wire sleeve and was dead.