Skip to main content
Home WILDLEX

Main navigation

  • About
  • User Agreement
  • Acknowledgements
  • Other tools
    • ELC Learning Platform
    • Protected Areas Law
    • Law for Sustainability
    • Water Law and Governance Support Platform
    • ECOLEX
  • Contribute resources

User account menu

  • Log in

WILDLEX

Database of Wildlife Related Law

  • Court Decisions
  • Legislation
  • Literature
  • Resources
Found 36 search results
Show on map

Showing 36 court decisions filtered by Country (United Kingdom, United States of America)

Zoom in Zoom out Reset zoom Close
  • Sort by most recent
  • Sort by least recent
  • Sort by relevance

R v Jungthirapanich

United Kingdom
Court of Appeal
National - higher court
Criminal
2002

The appellant pleaded guilty to being knowingly concerned in the fraudulent evasion of the restriction on the importation of wild birds. The appellant was concerned in smuggling 23 wildbirds from Thailand.

R v Humphrey

United Kingdom
Court of Appeal
National - higher court
Criminal
2003

The appellant was convicted of 22 offences of unlawfully importing or dealing with animals and birds of endangered species. The appellant was concerned in importing 23 birds of prey in two suit cases.

R v Misanki Kuranku Matudi

United Kingdom
Court of Appeal
National - higher court
Criminal
2003

On 28 November 2000 a consignment arrived at Heathrow from the Cameroons on a Swissair flight via Zurich. The consignor was Mrs Monie and the consignee and importer the appellant. The consignment contained for the most part frozen cassava leaves and indeed that was how the accompanying documents described it.

United states v hale

United States of America
United states Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Criminal
2004

The Hales, a married couple, owned and operated a wholesale caviar business, Royaloff Caviar, in Tennessee and Kentucky. They utilized the roe of paddlefish (Polyodon spathula), which are large, shark-like river fish with long, flat blade-like snouts.

Defenders of Wildlife v. Hogarth

United States of America
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
National - higher court
General
2003

Fishermen in the Eastern Tropical Pacific Ocean sought to exploit the synergy between dolphins and yellowfin tuna and began adopting a fishing method called purse seine fishing. Fishermen using this method inevitably set their nets around dolphins and tuna alike.

Loggerhead Turtle v. Volusia County

United States of America
United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
National - higher court
General
1998

A citizen filled a suit seeking declaratory and injunctive relief against a county in the state of Florida. Invoking a vicarious-liability theory, the plaintiffs alleged that the county’s “refusal ... to ban beachfront artificial light sources that adversely impact sea turtles” violated the ESA’s “take” prohibition.

United States of America v Bernal

United States of America
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
National - higher court
Civil
1996

Victor Bernal and Eduardo Berges were convicted of various crimes in connection with an attempt to export two endangered primates--an orangutan and a gorilla--from the United States to Mexico in violation of the Lacey Act Amendments of 1981 and the Endangered Species Act of 1973.

Humane Society of the United States v. Clinton

United States of America
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
National - higher court
General
2001

The Driftnet Act establishes a process under which the United States may take various actions against a foreign nation whose fishing vessels on the high seas engage in large-scale driftnet fishing. Italian fishing vessels were using these nets. Subsequent negotiations between Italy and the President of the U.S.

Humane Society of the United States v. Brown

United States of America
United States Court of International Trade
Others
Other or unknown
1996

In addition to banning large-scale pelagic driftnets by U.S. vessels and nationals, the Driftnet Act established a mechanism to deter the use of driftnets by foreign vessels in international waters. Under this mechanism, the U.S.

Defenders of Wildlife v. Gutierrez

United States of America
District of Columbia
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
National - higher court
General
2008

On May 19, 2005, a group of environmental organizations (appellants in this case) submitted a petition for emergency rulemaking to NMFS, which requested immediate regulations to require all ships entering and leaving all major East Coast ports to travel at speeds of 12 knots or less within 25 nautical miles of port entrances during expected righ

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Current page 3
  • Page 4
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »
Search filters

Country

  • Andorra (1)
  • Australia (2)
  • Botswana (36)
  • Cameroon (360)
  • Canada (10)
  • China (303)
  • Congo (385)
  • Eswatini, Kingdom of (2)
  • Gabon (72)
  • India (7)
  • International (4)
  • Kenya (3)
  • Malawi (5)
  • Namibia (30)
  • South Africa (31)
  • Tanzania, Un. Rep. of (205)
  • Uganda (224)
  • (-) United Kingdom (11)
  • (-) United States of America (25)
  • Zambia (12)
  • Zimbabwe (1)

Territorial subdivision

  • District of Columbia (1)
  • Ohio (1)

Type of court

  • National - higher court (26)
  • National - lower court (7)
  • Others (1)

Species

  • African elephant (7)
  • Black rhinoceros (2)
  • Blue King Crab (1)
  • Chinkara (Indian gazelle) (1)
  • Elephant (1)
  • Fish (6)
  • Gorilla (1)
  • Gyrfalcon (1)
  • Macaw (1)
  • Monkey (1)
  • Narwhale (1)
  • Orangutan (1)
  • Paddlefish (roe of) (1)
  • Pancake Tortoise (1)
  • Pangolin (1)
  • Parrot (1)
  • Peregrine Falcon (2)
  • Rhinoceros (1)
  • Slipper orchid (1)
  • Sperm Whale (2)
  • Tortoise (1)
  • Turtle (2)
  • Urial (Punjab) (1)
  • Walrus (1)

Language

  • English (36)

Year/Period

from to
Reset all filters
  • IUCN
  • GIZ

Footer menu

  • Contact