Skip to main content
Home WILDLEX

Main navigation

  • About
  • User Agreement
  • Acknowledgements
  • Other tools
    • ELC Learning Platform
    • Protected Areas Law
    • Law for Sustainability
    • Water Law and Governance Support Platform
    • ECOLEX
  • Contribute resources

User account menu

  • Log in

WILDLEX

Database of Wildlife Related Law

  • Court Decisions
  • Legislation
  • Literature
  • Resources
Found 29 search results
Show on map

Showing 29 court decisions filtered by Country (United States of America, International)

Zoom in Zoom out Reset zoom Close
  • Sort by most recent
  • Sort by least recent
  • Sort by relevance

Criminal Proceedings against Rubach

International
European Court of Justice
International court
2009

The Honduran Curly hair tarantula is a species protected under CITES and Council Regulation (EC) No 338/97 on theprotection of wild fauna and flora (“the EC Regulation”). This European Court of Justice (ECJ) case concerns the interpretation of Article 8(5) of the EC Regulation.

Humane Society International Inc v Kyodo Senpaku Kaisha Ltd 2008 FCA 3

International
International court
Criminal
2015

This case involved a string of litigation concerning an application for an injunction and declaration to restrain Japanese whaling in the Australian Whale Sanctuary adjacent to Antarctica. The case was brought by conservation group, the Human Society International (HSI), against the Japanese company, Kyodo Senpaku Kaisha Ltd.

United States of America v. 144,774 Pounds of Blue King Crab

United States of America
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
National - higher court
Administrative
2005

This interlocutory appeal arises out of a claim to king crab made by appellants Deep Sea Fisheries and Deep Sea Harvester (collectively, "Deep Sea"). The king crab at issue was caught within the Russian Exclusive Economic Zone ("EEZ") by two Russian vessels, the F/V Deep Sea Harvester and the F/V Lucky Star.

Criminal Proceedings against Xavier Tridon

International
European Court of Justice
International court
2001

Mr. Tridon operates a centre for the artificial incubation of parrot eggs in Champagnier. He is accused in the main proceedings of having transferred for consideration captive born and bred specimens of species of macaw whose use for commercial purposes is prohibited throughout national territory by the Guyane decree.

Criminal Proceedings against Jan Nilsson

International
European Court of Justice
International court
2003

The prosecutor indicted Mr. Nilsson for:

United States of America v Place

United States of America
United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts
National - lower court
Criminal
2014

In March, 2011, a federal jury in this Court convicted Place of participating in criminal conspiracies to violate the Lacey and Endangered Species Acts in violation of 18 U.S.C.§ 371, engaging in the illegal trade of sperm whale teeth in violation of the Lacey Act, 16 U.S.C.§§ 3372-3373 and smuggling sperm whale teeth and narwahl tusks into the

United states v hale

United States of America
United states Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Criminal
2004

The Hales, a married couple, owned and operated a wholesale caviar business, Royaloff Caviar, in Tennessee and Kentucky. They utilized the roe of paddlefish (Polyodon spathula), which are large, shark-like river fish with long, flat blade-like snouts.

Defenders of Wildlife v. Hogarth

United States of America
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
National - higher court
General
2003

Fishermen in the Eastern Tropical Pacific Ocean sought to exploit the synergy between dolphins and yellowfin tuna and began adopting a fishing method called purse seine fishing. Fishermen using this method inevitably set their nets around dolphins and tuna alike.

Loggerhead Turtle v. Volusia County

United States of America
United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
National - higher court
General
1998

A citizen filled a suit seeking declaratory and injunctive relief against a county in the state of Florida. Invoking a vicarious-liability theory, the plaintiffs alleged that the county’s “refusal ... to ban beachfront artificial light sources that adversely impact sea turtles” violated the ESA’s “take” prohibition.

United States of America v Bernal

United States of America
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
National - higher court
Civil
1996

Victor Bernal and Eduardo Berges were convicted of various crimes in connection with an attempt to export two endangered primates--an orangutan and a gorilla--from the United States to Mexico in violation of the Lacey Act Amendments of 1981 and the Endangered Species Act of 1973.

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • Page 1
  • Current page 2
  • Page 3
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »
Search filters

Country

  • Andorra (1)
  • Australia (2)
  • Botswana (36)
  • Cameroon (360)
  • Canada (10)
  • China (303)
  • Congo (385)
  • Eswatini, Kingdom of (2)
  • Gabon (72)
  • India (7)
  • (-) International (4)
  • Kenya (3)
  • Malawi (5)
  • Namibia (30)
  • South Africa (31)
  • Tanzania, Un. Rep. of (205)
  • Uganda (224)
  • United Kingdom (11)
  • (-) United States of America (25)
  • Zambia (12)
  • Zimbabwe (1)

Territorial subdivision

  • District of Columbia (1)
  • Ohio (1)

Type of court

  • International court (4)
  • National - higher court (16)
  • National - lower court (6)
  • Others (1)

Species

  • African elephant (6)
  • Antarctic minke whales (1)
  • Blue King Crab (1)
  • Chinkara (Indian gazelle) (1)
  • Curly Hair Tarantula (1)
  • Elephant (1)
  • Fin whales (1)
  • Fish (6)
  • Gorilla (1)
  • Humpback whales (1)
  • Narwhale (1)
  • Orangutan (1)
  • Paddlefish (roe of) (1)
  • Pancake Tortoise (1)
  • Parrot (1)
  • Rhinoceros (1)
  • Sperm Whale (1)
  • Turtle (2)
  • Urial (Punjab) (1)
  • Walrus (1)

Language

  • English (29)

Year/Period

from to
Reset all filters
  • IUCN
  • GIZ

Footer menu

  • Contact