Skip to main content
Home WILDLEX

Main navigation

  • About
  • User Agreement
  • Acknowledgements
  • Other tools
    • ELC Learning Platform
    • Protected Areas Law
    • Law for Sustainability
    • Water Law and Governance Support Platform
    • ECOLEX
  • Contribute resources

User account menu

  • Log in

WILDLEX

Database of Wildlife Related Law

  • Court Decisions
  • Legislation
  • Literature
  • Resources
Found 32 search results
Show on map

Showing 32 court decisions filtered by Country (India, United States of America)

Zoom in Zoom out Reset zoom Close
  • Sort by most recent
  • Sort by least recent
  • Sort by relevance

United States of America v Sylla

United States of America
United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York
National - lower court
Criminal
2010

Pending before the court is defendant Kemo Sylla's motion to suppress physical evidence seized during a search of his residence at the time of his arrest on December 3, 2008. Sylla is charged with one count of smuggling African elephant ivory into the United States, in violation of 18 U.S.C.

Princl. Conservator of Forests v J.K. Johnson ors.

India
Supreme Court of India
National - higher court
2011

The question raised in this appeal is: whether a specified officer empowered under Section 54(1) of the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 as amended by the Wild Life(Protection) Amendment Act, 2002 (Act 16 of 2003) to compound offences has power, competence and authority, on payment of a sum of money by way of composition of the offence by a pers

Hasan Khan v State of Madhya Pradesh

India
Madhya Pradesh High Court
National - lower court
2014

A charge sheet dated 28-12-2014 was issued to the appellant. Certain charges were leveled against the appellant pertaining to his conduct.

Balram Kumawat v Union of India and ors.

India
Supreme Court of India
National - higher court
2003

The appellants had imported mammoth fossil said to be of an extinct species in the year 1937.The stock of mammoth fossil held by the appellants is said to be periodically checked by the statutory authorities.

Indian Handicrafts Emporium v Union of India

India
Supreme Court of India
National - higher court
2003

In this case the petitioner had challenged the constitutional validity of Amendment Act 44, 1991, to the Constitution of India, which prohibited trade in imported ivory. The appeals which arise out of a common judgment and order dated 20.3.1997 passed by a Division Bench of the Delhi High Court.

Jama Corporation P. Ltd. v Union of India and ors.

India
Delhi High Court
National - higher court
2003

The petitioner aggrieved by the letter dated 23.6.2003 whereby it has been informed by the Ministry of Environment and Forest that the petitioner's request of import of Caiman Crocodilus Fuscus skin from USA cannot be granted. The petitioner intended to import tanned skin of Caiman Crocodilus Fuscus from the USA.

Cottage industries exposition v union of india and ors.

India
Delhi High Court
National - higher court
2007

On 6th April 1996, 16th April 1996 and 12th May 1996, M/s Istihaq & Co. supplied various types of shawls to the petitioner company. The supplies included shawls which have been seized by the respondent.On 7th November, 1996, the petitioner No.

United States of America v. 144,774 Pounds of Blue King Crab

United States of America
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
National - higher court
Administrative
2005

This interlocutory appeal arises out of a claim to king crab made by appellants Deep Sea Fisheries and Deep Sea Harvester (collectively, "Deep Sea"). The king crab at issue was caught within the Russian Exclusive Economic Zone ("EEZ") by two Russian vessels, the F/V Deep Sea Harvester and the F/V Lucky Star.

United States of America v Place

United States of America
United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts
National - lower court
Criminal
2014

In March, 2011, a federal jury in this Court convicted Place of participating in criminal conspiracies to violate the Lacey and Endangered Species Acts in violation of 18 U.S.C.§ 371, engaging in the illegal trade of sperm whale teeth in violation of the Lacey Act, 16 U.S.C.§§ 3372-3373 and smuggling sperm whale teeth and narwahl tusks into the

United states v hale

United States of America
United states Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Criminal
2004

The Hales, a married couple, owned and operated a wholesale caviar business, Royaloff Caviar, in Tennessee and Kentucky. They utilized the roe of paddlefish (Polyodon spathula), which are large, shark-like river fish with long, flat blade-like snouts.

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • Page 1
  • Current page 2
  • Page 3
  • Page 4
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »
Search filters

Country

  • Andorra (1)
  • Australia (2)
  • Botswana (36)
  • Cameroon (360)
  • Canada (10)
  • China (303)
  • Congo (385)
  • Eswatini, Kingdom of (2)
  • Gabon (72)
  • (-) India (7)
  • International (4)
  • Kenya (3)
  • Malawi (5)
  • Namibia (30)
  • South Africa (31)
  • Tanzania, Un. Rep. of (205)
  • Uganda (224)
  • United Kingdom (11)
  • (-) United States of America (25)
  • Zambia (12)
  • Zimbabwe (1)

Territorial subdivision

  • District of Columbia (1)
  • Ohio (1)

Type of court

  • National - higher court (22)
  • National - lower court (7)
  • Others (1)

Species

  • African elephant (6)
  • Blue King Crab (1)
  • Chinkara (Indian gazelle) (1)
  • Elephant (2)
  • Fish (6)
  • Gorilla (1)
  • Mammoth (2)
  • Narwhale (1)
  • Orangutan (1)
  • Paddlefish (roe of) (1)
  • Pancake Tortoise (1)
  • Parrot (1)
  • Rabbit (1)
  • Rhinoceros (1)
  • Sperm Whale (1)
  • Tibetan antelope (1)
  • Turtle (2)
  • Urial (Punjab) (1)
  • Walrus (1)
  • Wild boar (1)

Language

  • English (32)

Year/Period

from to
Reset all filters
  • IUCN
  • GIZ

Footer menu

  • Contact